Tom Skinner replied to my comment on: "Featured Meme…": I don't care what you believe, evolution is an irrefutable fact and you are a flagrant liar. I have enough of your lies. Blocked.

So, you know me… lol.

Tom, your response proves something important.

You did not answer a single argument. You did not address a single piece of evidence. You chose a personal attack and then blocked the discussion. That is not how truth is defended. That is how discussion is avoided.

You say evolution is an “irrefutable fact.” If something is truly irrefutable, it does not need insults to defend it. It can stand on evidence, mechanisms, and open debate. Science grows stronger when it allows challenges. It grows weaker when people silence disagreement.

I have been clear about my position. I do not believe in macroevolution. I believe life shows evidence of design and purpose. You are free to disagree with that view. Serious people disagree about many things in science and philosophy. That is normal.

What is not normal is claiming that disagreement equals dishonesty.

Many credentialed scientists question aspects of evolutionary theory. Others defend it strongly. That is how inquiry works. Debate, testing, and criticism refine ideas over time.

Calling someone a liar because they hold a different conclusion does not strengthen your argument. It weakens it.

If the evidence for evolution is as strong as you say, it does not need anger. It does not need censorship. It can survive scrutiny.

Blocking someone after making accusations ends the conversation, but it does not prove the point you tried to make. It only shows that you were not interested in the discussion to begin with.

Please like, share and follow to be a part of the fun 😉