Talking about making a podcast and sharing my everyday life stories and chaotic moments. Along, with my weight loss journey.

A journey from feeling unseen and without refuge to quietly continuing forward in faith—trusting that even in loneliness, there is still a path toward peace, light, and being held.

Hello everyone, Dr. Mason here with a question and then an answer from Liz Stapelberg on Quora. Here is the question first. “If God isn't Trinity, then who was Jesus referring to when He said, 'Make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit'?" Now here is her answer to the question: she said, “God is not a name; it's a TITLE. God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit is the Godhead. They are Three Persons in One Godhead. That means that the Father is God, the Son is God, and so is the Holy Spirit God. John 1:1 In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was with GOD, and the WORD was GOD... the Word is Jesus.

With the covers held hard against my aching fingers, the book never ceases. The writer merely transcribes a world in word-fashion. You have to do the rest. Join me as we transcend the world together.

In 'Cycling up', the tension builds and so does the energy. Danny knows what's coming; the boar told him so. He's afraid of what he might do to the people who deserve it but even more afraid for the people who don't.

Hello everyone, let's take a look at my DB-FEP + DQA + ELIS Working Paper…. The Imagination Objection… A Forensic Evaluation of the Claim That Evolution Skeptics… Lack the Education or Imagination to Accept Darwinian Theory… Again, I am Dr. Mason, Ph.D. Independent Scholar and creator of Design Biology: Forensic Evaluation Protocol (DB-FEP)… here is my abstract… Proponents of Darwinian macroevolution routinely characterize skeptics as suffering from ignorance, cognitive deficiency, or a failure of imagination.

The cry for help that goes unheard or falls upon a deaf ear. Turn your back, ignore my pain, hide the shame, and bury your guilt. A life destroyed by silence, no one cared

Reflecting on the afterlife is becoming a growing interest of mine for various reasons, not the least of which is that my life is succumbing to the inglorious process of the body losing energy and functionally degrading day by day. I have studied many religions and philosophies in search of answers to the question of why life is so frustratingly short and without apparent meaning.

A detailed essay on American history, and and overview of the overarching themes of it's social and political structure.

In a world long forgotten by the warmth of hope, a world where shadows clung to every corner like a second skin, there lived a father and his beloved son. Their home was modest, tucked away at the edge of a weary village where the sun rarely broke through the thick veil of despair that hung over the land. Life had once been vibrant here—children laughing in the streets, families gathering around fires, songs rising like incense into the night sky. But those days had faded into memory. A creeping darkness had settled over the world, draining color from the fields and strength from the hearts of its people. The father, a man of quiet strength and unwavering devotion, worked tirelessly to shield his son from the worst of the world’s suffering. The boy, gentle and full of light, carried a warmth within him that seemed untouched by the gloom around them. His laughter, rare but radiant, was like a spark in a world of ash.

The last few days, driving in a jeep with no doors, cat calling college boys, to coming home and chilling, to not getting sleep, to Sunday.

This topic is very important because there should be a person in everyone’s life they can trust. Trust in the relationship is important because you can get mad at people for being not like you. There are so many different people and is what makes great friends.

This entry consists of my practices using my sensory details. This entry also has the perfect Ostara jars and Honey Cake.

Hello everyone, Dr. Dan Mason here. Could someone please tell me why Macroevolution Fails to meet the basic standards of Evidence… There I was having a nice conversation with my atheist (buddy) James (not lol). So I responded to James (my dear friend, lol). James, if you strip away the insults, and the issue is still the same. No one said scientists “got bored” and invented a story. That is your caricature, not my argument. My point is narrower… a descriptive sequence, comparative anatomy, and genetic similarity do not by themselves prove that unguided processes fully explain the origin of complex, integrated systems. They show biological variation and possible pathways. They do not automatically close the causal question.

A short entry about getting new journals, retiring ones that didn't serve a purpose and enjoying the weather.

In this entry, I record notes related to a book that I was reading. The notes discuss stone casting and water divination as a way to use as oracles.

Let’s Do A Thought Experiment Assume, for the sake of argument, that the scientific majority is right about many lower-level biological facts but wrong at the higher macro level about unguided sufficiency. Assume they correctly observe variation, mutation, selection, drift, adaptation, and molecular patterning, yet incorrectly conclude that these are enough to explain the origin of major biological architectures and life itself.

How will we remember you? I promise it won't be as kind You watched the poor starve As you hoarded your last dime From the poem "The Hoarder's Legacy"

The Coming Collapse of Macroevolution: A Forensic Evaluation of Origins Science What we have before us is not science, it is Speculation that has become a materialistic Structure. We have witnessed in the last 100 years how origins science came to protect a story long after the evidence ran out. There is a point where scientific speculation stops acting like a temporary bridge and starts acting like a permanent building. That is the problem.

James, your reply is polished, but it still leans on several sleights of hand. You accuse me of treating information as “mystical,” yet I did not say information is magic. I said information is real, functionally organized, and not reducible to chemistry alone. That is not wordplay. Chemistry describes the material medium. It does not erase the coded, rule-based, function-specific arrangement carried in that medium.