This is short but to the point. Please enjoy and let me know what you think. This is the first time expressing my opinion

Part I of Horror meets civics in what I would like to say is an entirely new genre of horror, but I can't claim that given the state of real-world affairs at this point.

Are we all bound by a common moral code, or is right and wrong simply a matter of cultural perspective? Our comprehensive report delves into the age-old debate between universalism and relativism. It explores the philosophical, empirical, and practical arguments for a universal ethic—from Kant's rationalism to recent cross-cultural scientific studies—and dissects the most significant objections to the idea. We also reveal how the concept of universal morality, particularly through Natural Law, profoundly influenced the founding principles of the United States. Read the full essay to explore the foundations of a shared humanity and the enduring questions that define our moral landscape.

I simply advised that it was my opinion that these certain judges were depriving me of my due process rights, and I believe that their ultimate goal was to try to have me arrested. It’s an absurd thing to say out loud, but I still feel that it is genuinely their goal to try to have me arrested.

White Privilege exists. But not just to benefit white folks. It also keeps white people from seeing it.

Some will call this justice, retribution, karma. They will celebrate that a man who did so much damage is gone. But this is not victory. It is hypocrisy. It feeds the very fire he stoked — the narrative of victimhood, of conservatives under attack, of America being destroyed from within. His death will not bury his ideology. It will strengthen it. He will be turned into a martyr, his name weaponized in ways far more powerful than his speeches ever were.

The discourse behind the approach to immigration law enforcement by this generation of politicians is easily refutable by the facts. When confronted with the empirical proof it just can't hold terrain. This essay was born by the obvious missinformation that most of the country has based their position on. It is not a secret that a big part of the population arrives to a conclusion without investing the appropriate time to get informed. That's why I placed a lot of effort to make the information accesible with the less time investment needed. If one reader decides to take the time to read the whole essay my job would be done.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the demographic and contextual profile of mass shooters in the United States. The central thesis is that the profile of a mass shooter is not a singular demographic type but rather a complex, multi-factorial "syndrome" rooted in the convergence of demographic, psychological, behavioral, and societal factors. The analysis moves beyond superficial media portrayals to reveal a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of these individuals. It emphasizes that while certain demographic characteristics are prevalent, they are not causal and only become meaningful when viewed in conjunction with a series of shared, non-demographic risk factors. The investigation highlights the critical roles of premeditation, suicidal ideation, and the presence of observable pre-attack warning signs, transforming the understanding of these events from random acts of violence to often preventable catastrophes.

Beyond a simple metaphor of exclusion, the "wall of separation" can be reinterpreted as a protective assumption that safeguards religious freedom and enables the robust participation of faith communities in public life. This perspective argues that the principle's primary purpose is not to limit the church but to shield it from government interference and potential corruption. By preventing the state from sponsoring an official religion or giving preference to certain denominations, the "wall" ensures that spiritual decisions remain free from political influence. This protective fence, rather than being an obstacle to faith, is a constitutional bulwark that preserves religious autonomy and fosters a vibrant, pluralistic society where diverse faiths can thrive without fear of government coercion or control.

The concept of the separation of church and state is a cornerstone of American democracy, yet it is not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Instead, it is an interpretation derived from a single letter penned by Thomas Jefferson in 1802. In this essay, we delve into Jefferson’s original intent for this "wall of separation" and challenge the common misinterpretation that seeks to exclude religious influence from public life. We argue that the wall was a protective measure, a safeguard for religious freedom, and that the church has a vital obligation to participate in public discourse and social change.

The law quietly shapes every facet of our daily lives, we can make informed choices to safeguard privacy. Similarly, knowing our rights during encounters with officials—through tools like Quo Warranto—transforms us from passive citizens to active stewards of accountability. Whether securing property against taxation, ensuring election integrity, or negotiating fair contracts, legal awareness turns everyday actions into opportunities for empowerment, fostering a freer, more prosperous society.

At 04:18 AM EDT on September 5, 2025, the call to restore the Republic grows urgent, urging citizens to reclaim their constitutional sovereignty.

Sovereignty stems from divine origins, rooted in Genesis 1:28, empowering individuals to govern themselves with unalienable rights.

The conflict began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and other militants launched a surprise assault from Gaza into Israel, killing roughly 1,200 people—including many civilians—and taking dozens of hostages, triggering Israel’s military response.

There are many things our world has going on and it can become overwhelming and difficult to process if you are someone who pays attention to the right things. If you happen to be someone without religious beliefs but you have been blessed with a moral compass the same goes for you. Many people may ask why a Higher Power isn’t stepping in but I like to think that it starts with us.

Today's talk is about common law and the differences and similarities between the crimes of Rape, Homicide, and Murder. This essay was used for my criminal law class. So take a look at this note to learn about the laws surrounding those three crimes.

Charles Colson’s essay "Clean Livin': Protecting Ourselves from Ourselves" cuts through the noise of today’s endless health care debates with a simple, uncomfortable truth: America’s most expensive health problems aren’t caused by a lack of government programs—they’re self-inflicted.

This is my first post, so ya hope you enjoy diving into my world for a minute plz support me i have so much to tell, but no one to listen. This post is about WW2, so if it seems old... that's me, I guess, my style, my write, my choice. Plz enjoy

In the maze of immigration law, justice often hides in the margins. The Family Unity Exception isn't a headline; it's a footnote. For families facing separation, it's everything. This provision allows asylum seekers, barred by technicalities, to fight for the right to stay together. It's not guaranteed. It's not simple. It's a crack in the system where compassion still flickers. In Chains & Exceptions, I explore how legal nuance becomes a lifeline, and why the stories that defy the rules are the ones that most deserve to be told.

In a world full of pain and suffering, we start to ask the bigger questions. The whys, the how's, the whens. But what happens when those questions aren't answered? - A poem by the social scientist