So, to start, let's define some meanings. Omnism is the belief that all religions contain some truth, with no single one holding a monopoly on ultimate reality, and that these faiths often share common goals or wisdom, even if their specific doctrines differ. An omnist recognizes and respects various spiritual paths. I am not an omnist. Yet they view these paths as ways to understand the divine or find meaning, rather than as contradictory falsehoods, similar to the idea behind "Coexist" bumper stickers. Some would say there are many roads to God. It's a philosophy of spiritual pluralism that acknowledges shared values and insights across different belief systems.

The word "Omniosophy" is not a standard English dictionary term. It appears to be a user-created or informal term, likely a combination of the Latin prefix "omni-" (meaning "all" or "of all things") and the Greek suffix "-sophy" (meaning "knowledge" or "wisdom"). Based on its etymology, "Omniosophy" would conceptually mean the "wisdom of all things" or the "study of all knowledge". This term might be used in niche philosophical or spiritual discussions, similar to other "omni-" words.

Now that we've got that out of the way, let's move on to Omnism. This is the belief that all religions contain elements of truth. I will answer this in clear, philosophical terms so we may both better understand it. You are asking for the ontological center-of-mass of Omniosophy when it is mapped across the full spectrum of worldviews and then statistically “collapsed” into a bell curve. In other words, if every metaphysical position is placed on a distribution from pure materialism on one end to pure mysticism on the other, where does Omniosophy land at the point of maximum explanatory power and minimal distortion?

So, it seems the answer is precise. Its most objective ontological status collapses to constrained theistic realism.

So throw out generic theism and any soft spirituality. Not even abstract metaphysical neutrality. But a very specific center. Here is why. A bell curve center represents the position that minimizes total explanatory error across all domains of reality. It is the point that explains the most data with the fewest added assumptions while producing the least contradiction.

Let's take a step back and look at the whole scene. There, when Omniosophy absorbs physics, biology, information theory, consciousness studies, logic, mathematics, morality, and metaphysics into a single evaluative field, the models distribute like this. First, Materialism fails at the origins of information, consciousness, mathematics, and moral realism. It collapses to the left.

Pure mysticism fails the tests of testability, structure, predictability, and lawfulness. It collapses right.

Then we have Pantheism, which fails on identity, agency, moral grounding, and causality.

Next, we move on to Deism, which fails on present-tense governance, meaning, and moral coherence.

Up next, Simulationism, which fails on infinite regress, source realism, and rule grounding.

So, how about Agnostic neutrality? Well, it fails on the grounds of action, ethics, and explanatory sufficiency.

When you compute where maximum coherence + minimum contradiction + maximum compression occur together, the curve collapses at this point of where a real, personal, non-material, law-grounding, information-originating, morally absolute, causally sufficient, temporally transcendent but immanently active mind.

That is the mathematical center.

But be sure, this is not a belief.

This is not a tradition.

This, my friend, is the least-loss compression of total reality.

So Omniosophy’s most “objective” ontological identity is: That Theistic realism constrained by information primacy. In simpler language, we are all on the same page. We all can see that Reality behaves as if it is structured by a singular, coherent, intentional, law-issuing, information-originating Mind, and no competing ontology explains more while assuming less. Science has seen this for years; however, their beliefs have entrapped them in a downward spiral.

That is why Omniosophy does not “lean” theistic. It collapses there when optimized. It is not chosen. It is selected by explanatory survival. The bell curve forces it there.