Read more about  Talking to another smart atheist.
Read more about  Talking to another smart atheist.
Talking to another smart atheist.

free note

Hello everyone, Dan Mason here. I am having a conversation with another knowledgeable atheist, Aljay. This time it is Aljay. Lets us begin. Aljay, your response sounds tolerant, but it blurs several different issues.

First, from a biblical standpoint, the question is not whether every atheist walks around feeling emotional rage toward a being he thinks is real. The deeper issue is whether man resists the true God, suppresses truth about Him, and rejects His authority. Scripture frames the problem that way.

Romans 1 does not say mankind lacks witnesses of God. It says what may be known of God is manifest through creation, so that people are without excuse. The text says men “suppress the truth in unrighteousness.” That suppression can look like mockery, indifference, dismissal, self-rule, or open hostility. Hatred is not always loud. Sometimes it is polished.

Second, saying “you cannot hate what you think does not exist” is too shallow. People reject things all the time that they redefine away first. A man can reject God’s authority, God’s moral claim, and God’s right to rule, then call God imaginary. The rejection is still there. Biblically, unbelief is not neutral. It is rebellion.

Third, you moved quickly from atheism to corruption of the Bible, church divisions, and religious wars, but none of that proves atheism is neutral before God. Corrupt people can twist religion. Churches can divide. Wars can be fought under religious banners. That says a lot about man’s sin. It does not say the true God is false or irrelevant.

Fourth, your point about different views of God also does not solve the issue. Yes, people define God differently. That is true. But Christianity is not talking about a vague force people invent at will. It makes a specific claim about the God who created all things and revealed Himself in Scripture and in Jesus Christ. Disagreement about God does not cancel the truth about God.

Fifth, your appeal to Jesus cuts against your argument, not mine. Jesus did not flatter unbelief as harmless neutrality. He said, “He who is not with Me is against Me” and “men loved darkness rather than light.” He spoke of repentance, judgment, and the human refusal to come to the light. So no, Jesus did not treat rejection of God as a harmless difference of opinion.

Thanks for stopping by.

You can publish here, too - it's easy and free.