Dearest Vel, I have been asking you the most straightforward question, yet you still fail to answer me. My question is… Can abiogenesis and biological evolution be investigated and evaluated using the scientific method, and if so, to what extent? If you are unable to answer the question clearly, you resort to attacking me instead. When you do, your statement collapses under its own assumptions.

This note explores what real faith looks like in a broken world. It shows how a man or woman can stand firm when culture falls apart, how God strengthens those who trust Him, and why hope rises even in dark seasons. It invites readers into a journey of courage, redemption, and steady confidence in God’s hand at work.

I made a comment on YouTube about the false teachings of the Trinity. melmerc_sjn responded by saying… “You are ignoring the fact that John 1 explains how NOTHING was made without God the Son, aka JESUS, the Word of God. The Trinity is present from the first three verses of Genesis.” Then I responded by saying, “John 1 does not teach that a second divine person called “God the Son” created the world. That title never appears in Scripture. The Bible says “the Son of God,” referring to God manifested in genuine human flesh.

The Voice That Wasn’t God When we are young, passion can feel like truth. Lust can feel like love. Hormones can feel like destiny. Desire can become so strong that we mistake it for the voice of God. But not every feeling is guidance. Not every open door is from God.

How Did Man Live Before God Gave Israel the Torah? Exploring the biblical record of humanity's relationship with God from Creation through the Patriarchs: conscience, covenant, and direct revelation in the absence of the written Mosaic Law. One of the most common questions about the Bible's timeline is this: how did people know right from wrong, and how did they relate to God, before the Ten Commandments and the full Law of Moses were given at Mount Sinai? The answer reveals something profound about God's consistent character. He has always dealt with humanity through relationship, revelation, and covenant, not just rules. Let's walk through the biblical record with clarity and forensic honesty.

A response to a reader named Vic Steblin who replied to my article… Vic said, “Apply Bayes' formula to all of history and also all of science, and one gets ZERO probability of anything supernatural. Use honest humility; there is NO GOD, and move on!” Now here is my reply… Vic, Bayes' theorem does not give a zero probability for God or the supernatural. You inserted the zero before doing the calculation. Bayes' theorem can be written: P(God | Evidence) = P(Evidence | God) × P(God) ÷ P(Evidence)

Here are my ten arguments against the Trinity, written from a Bible-first, non-Trinitarian Christian position. These are not shallow objections. They press the doctrine at its strongest pressure points: Scripture, language, logic, history, and worship.

When “Skepticism” Becomes a Rival Faith There is a kind of internet atheism that does not argue. He sneers. I had a run-in with Kaiser Basileus on Substack. He began by calling religious people idiots. Then he pretended his insult was evidence. He called faith “woo,” but then made sweeping claims about the universe, eternity, consciousness, origins, and meaning without proving any of them. That is not intellectual courage. That is selective skepticism. His first failure is simple: insult is not logic.

Ideas do not appear from nothing. They have fathers. The ideas that now govern Western bioethics, reproductive law, and end-of-life policy were shaped by specific people who held particular beliefs and argued for particular conclusions. Most of the people living under those ideas have never heard these names. That is not an accident. A framework that presents itself as scientific, neutral, and inevitable does not advertise its founders.

Genesis 1:1 says, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” Later, in Genesis 2:4, it seems that a second, different story of creation begins. The idea of two differing creation accounts is a common misinterpretation of these two passages, which, in fact, describe the same creation event. They do not disagree as to the order in which things were created and do not contradict one another. Genesis 1 describes the “six days of creation” (and a seventh day of rest); Genesis 2 covers only one day of that creation week—the sixth day—and there is no contradiction.