This is short but to the point. Please enjoy and let me know what you think. This is the first time expressing my opinion

Are we all bound by a common moral code, or is right and wrong simply a matter of cultural perspective? Our comprehensive report delves into the age-old debate between universalism and relativism. It explores the philosophical, empirical, and practical arguments for a universal ethic—from Kant's rationalism to recent cross-cultural scientific studies—and dissects the most significant objections to the idea. We also reveal how the concept of universal morality, particularly through Natural Law, profoundly influenced the founding principles of the United States. Read the full essay to explore the foundations of a shared humanity and the enduring questions that define our moral landscape.

Some will call this justice, retribution, karma. They will celebrate that a man who did so much damage is gone. But this is not victory. It is hypocrisy. It feeds the very fire he stoked — the narrative of victimhood, of conservatives under attack, of America being destroyed from within. His death will not bury his ideology. It will strengthen it. He will be turned into a martyr, his name weaponized in ways far more powerful than his speeches ever were.

The discourse behind the approach to immigration law enforcement by this generation of politicians is easily refutable by the facts. When confronted with the empirical proof it just can't hold terrain. This essay was born by the obvious missinformation that most of the country has based their position on. It is not a secret that a big part of the population arrives to a conclusion without investing the appropriate time to get informed. That's why I placed a lot of effort to make the information accesible with the less time investment needed. If one reader decides to take the time to read the whole essay my job would be done.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the demographic and contextual profile of mass shooters in the United States. The central thesis is that the profile of a mass shooter is not a singular demographic type but rather a complex, multi-factorial "syndrome" rooted in the convergence of demographic, psychological, behavioral, and societal factors. The analysis moves beyond superficial media portrayals to reveal a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of these individuals. It emphasizes that while certain demographic characteristics are prevalent, they are not causal and only become meaningful when viewed in conjunction with a series of shared, non-demographic risk factors. The investigation highlights the critical roles of premeditation, suicidal ideation, and the presence of observable pre-attack warning signs, transforming the understanding of these events from random acts of violence to often preventable catastrophes.

Beyond a simple metaphor of exclusion, the "wall of separation" can be reinterpreted as a protective assumption that safeguards religious freedom and enables the robust participation of faith communities in public life. This perspective argues that the principle's primary purpose is not to limit the church but to shield it from government interference and potential corruption. By preventing the state from sponsoring an official religion or giving preference to certain denominations, the "wall" ensures that spiritual decisions remain free from political influence. This protective fence, rather than being an obstacle to faith, is a constitutional bulwark that preserves religious autonomy and fosters a vibrant, pluralistic society where diverse faiths can thrive without fear of government coercion or control.

The concept of the separation of church and state is a cornerstone of American democracy, yet it is not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Instead, it is an interpretation derived from a single letter penned by Thomas Jefferson in 1802. In this essay, we delve into Jefferson’s original intent for this "wall of separation" and challenge the common misinterpretation that seeks to exclude religious influence from public life. We argue that the wall was a protective measure, a safeguard for religious freedom, and that the church has a vital obligation to participate in public discourse and social change.

The conflict began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and other militants launched a surprise assault from Gaza into Israel, killing roughly 1,200 people—including many civilians—and taking dozens of hostages, triggering Israel’s military response.

Today's talk is about common law and the differences and similarities between the crimes of Rape, Homicide, and Murder. This essay was used for my criminal law class. So take a look at this note to learn about the laws surrounding those three crimes.

This is my first post, so ya hope you enjoy diving into my world for a minute plz support me i have so much to tell, but no one to listen. This post is about WW2, so if it seems old... that's me, I guess, my style, my write, my choice. Plz enjoy

In a world full of pain and suffering, we start to ask the bigger questions. The whys, the how's, the whens. But what happens when those questions aren't answered? - A poem by the social scientist

“Navigating the Crossroads” is a timely exploration of today’s complex world politics. From shifting global power dynamics and major geopolitical rivalries to climate diplomacy and regional transformations, this blog offers clear, insightful analysis of the forces shaping international relations in 2025. Whether you're a student, policymaker, or globally curious reader, this post provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of the current geopolitical landscape.

In our ongoing look at American Independents, we’ve already explored who they are and how they’ve evolved over the decades. Today, let’s dig into where things stand now — and what might lie ahead.

This note explores the rich history of American independents—citizens and political leaders who have operated outside the traditional two-party system. From George Washington’s early warnings about political factions to modern voters rejecting partisan labels, independents have long shaped American democracy. The article highlights key moments, including third-party movements in the 19th century, high-profile independent campaigns like Theodore Roosevelt’s and Ross Perot’s, and the modern surge in independent identification. Despite systemic challenges, independents continue to influence elections, introduce new ideas, and represent a growing force in American politics.

Given that the United States declared its independence from Britain in 1776, the note emphasizes the Fourth of July's historical significance. It highlights that although the holiday is widely observed with fireworks and other celebrations, its actual significance is in upholding the principles of equality, freedom, and self-governance. While savoring the customs of the day, the post invites readers to consider the country's founding principles.

A gripping exploration of deception and betrayal lurking beneath the surface of a fractured society, where true enemies hide in plain sight and the fight for truth is more urgent than ever.

Selling arms to foreign countries isn't profiting our country. The president's waging war on a country, such as Iran, is of being to no benefit for the U.S. It hasn't been beneficial to us, in any way shape or form.

Humanity is greedy. We are greedy. Definition of greed. Cattle. Even dying costs money, when will we be set free?

The blog explores the complex relationship between Iran and former U.S. President Donald Trump. It outlines the historical context of U.S.–Iran relations, focusing on Trump’s decision to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) and reimpose harsh sanctions as part of a “maximum pressure” campaign. The post covers key events that escalated tensions—like oil tanker attacks, the downing of a U.S. drone, and the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani. It also discusses the domestic and international reactions to Trump’s policies, the economic impact on Iran, and how the administration’s actions influenced global diplomacy and regional stability. The blog concludes by reflecting on Trump’s legacy and how his approach continues to shape U.S.–Iran relations today.

Come on, people! We're not going to world war 3, just because the middle east hates us. They've always hated us. :D