America's drifting toward collectivism - and 2025's elections made it worse. from New York's socialism to California's chaos, big government's rising while freedom fades.

The shutdown isn’t about gridlock — it’s about leverage. Republicans voted 13 times to reopen the government, but Democrats refuse to budge. The math tells the truth the media won’t.

America is in crisis — protests, shutdowns, and corruption dominate the headlines. But chaos breeds opportunity. Here’s how Republicans can reclaim the mantle of leadership and chart a course toward liberty, accountability, and national renewal.

Opportunist? Creative Captive? What would you do if you were sponsored by one of history's great villains?

Uh-oh, the artist are arting, then here comes Hitler! Art and politics often inform one another. Even something as seemingly harmless as celebrating the human form in a stylized way can put a rock right up those Gestapo asses.

Goose-stepping into the spotlight of history, the self-professed "Third Reich"! The German people realize Fascism does just keep the trains on time, it seeps into the world of art and aesthetics.

The fact that America has a Constitution which knows right from wrong proves its moral superiority to the other nations; yet the fact that she can and does do wrong proves her inferiority to any nations that have not one.

What does it mean when a government shuts down? Is it temporary or permanent? And what does it mean for Americans across the country? In today’s blog, I’ll be breaking down what a government shutdown truly means and why it matters. Click to find out more!

The relationship between the Church and politics has long been a subject of debate. Some argue that the Church should remain separate from political life, focusing solely on spiritual matters. Yet history, Scripture, and theology suggest otherwise. The Church is not merely a private spiritual fellowship but a public witness to God’s justice and truth. If Jesus Himself confronted the political and religious institutions of His time—most notably the Sanhedrin, which functioned as both a spiritual and political authority—then the Church, as His body, inherits not only the right but the obligation to engage actively in the political sphere.

(Very really good poem) How much is life worth? Dollar Wake up , They’re planning wars for the dollar

This is short but to the point. Please enjoy and let me know what you think. This is the first time expressing my opinion

Are we all bound by a common moral code, or is right and wrong simply a matter of cultural perspective? Our comprehensive essay delves into the age-old debate between universalism and relativism. It explores the philosophical, empirical, and practical arguments for a universal ethic—from Kant's rationalism to recent cross-cultural scientific studies—and dissects the most significant objections to the idea. We also reveal how the concept of universal morality, particularly through Natural Law, profoundly influenced the founding principles of the United States. Read the full essay to explore the foundations of a shared humanity and the enduring questions that define our moral landscape.

Some will call this justice, retribution, karma. They will celebrate that a man who did so much damage is gone. But this is not victory. It is hypocrisy. It feeds the very fire he stoked — the narrative of victimhood, of conservatives under attack, of America being destroyed from within. His death will not bury his ideology. It will strengthen it. He will be turned into a martyr, his name weaponized in ways far more powerful than his speeches ever were.

The discourse behind the approach to immigration law enforcement by this generation of politicians is easily refutable by the facts. When confronted with the empirical proof it just can't hold terrain. This essay was born by the obvious missinformation that most of the country has based their position on. It is not a secret that a big part of the population arrives to a conclusion without investing the appropriate time to get informed. That's why I placed a lot of effort to make the information accesible with the less time investment needed. If one reader decides to take the time to read the whole essay my job would be done.

This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the demographic and contextual profile of mass shooters in the United States. The central thesis is that the profile of a mass shooter is not a singular demographic type but rather a complex, multi-factorial "syndrome" rooted in the convergence of demographic, psychological, behavioral, and societal factors. The analysis moves beyond superficial media portrayals to reveal a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of these individuals. It emphasizes that while certain demographic characteristics are prevalent, they are not causal and only become meaningful when viewed in conjunction with a series of shared, non-demographic risk factors. The investigation highlights the critical roles of premeditation, suicidal ideation, and the presence of observable pre-attack warning signs, transforming the understanding of these events from random acts of violence to often preventable catastrophes.

Beyond a simple metaphor of exclusion, the "wall of separation" can be reinterpreted as a protective assumption that safeguards religious freedom and enables the robust participation of faith communities in public life. This perspective argues that the principle's primary purpose is not to limit the church but to shield it from government interference and potential corruption. By preventing the state from sponsoring an official religion or giving preference to certain denominations, the "wall" ensures that spiritual decisions remain free from political influence. This protective fence, rather than being an obstacle to faith, is a constitutional bulwark that preserves religious autonomy and fosters a vibrant, pluralistic society where diverse faiths can thrive without fear of government coercion or control.

The concept of the separation of church and state is a cornerstone of American democracy, yet it is not explicitly stated in the Constitution. Instead, it is an interpretation derived from a single letter penned by Thomas Jefferson in 1802. In this essay, we delve into Jefferson’s original intent for this "wall of separation" and challenge the common misinterpretation that seeks to exclude religious influence from public life. We argue that the wall was a protective measure, a safeguard for religious freedom, and that the church has a vital obligation to participate in public discourse and social change.

The conflict began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas and other militants launched a surprise assault from Gaza into Israel, killing roughly 1,200 people—including many civilians—and taking dozens of hostages, triggering Israel’s military response.

Today's talk is about common law and the differences and similarities between the crimes of Rape, Homicide, and Murder. This essay was used for my criminal law class. So take a look at this note to learn about the laws surrounding those three crimes.

This is my first post, so ya hope you enjoy diving into my world for a minute plz support me i have so much to tell, but no one to listen. This post is about WW2, so if it seems old... that's me, I guess, my style, my write, my choice. Plz enjoy