How deplatforming is silencing trained forensic professionals and empowering misinformation—undermining public trust in science, justice, and ethical discourse.

As true crime explodes across media platforms, ethical concerns rise alongside viewership. This investigative piece examines the psychological pull, blurred boundaries, and potential harms hidden behind our collective fascination with real-life horror.

As a media & constitutional law student, I used my PhD in Applied Ethics and examined the hidden consequences of algorithmic vigilantism in the digital age.

How misinformation and online mobs are eroding public trust in forensic science and expert testimony, undermining due process and scientific integrity.

Borderline Personality Disorder is one of the most stigmatized diagnoses in mental health. But behind closed doors, many psychiatrists quietly avoid these patients altogether.

Digital vigilantism blurs justice and harassment, fueling mob behavior and ethical concerns. These articles may interest you!

In the age of social media, online defamation cases are becoming more common. But what does it actually take to win a defamation lawsuit?

Handwriting is more than ink on a page—it’s a neurological imprint of the writer’s mind. In forensic psychology, every stroke, slant, and spacing pattern tells a story, especially in the case of serial offenders.

In today’s digital world, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is one of the most debated and misunderstood laws in the U.S.

In today’s digital age, the internet is both a tool for free expression and a battlefield for legal disputes. From social media platforms deciding what content stays up to online defamation lawsuits, internet law governs what can and cannot happen in the digital space. But who actually makes these rules? And how do they affect our rights?